Managing APQP in Foundries

Sahil Shah
Managing APQP in Foundries

When automotive foundries are awarded projects, they start with Design for Manufacturing (DFM) activities. It’s followed by the kickoff of tooling and patterns. As the project moves forward through tooling fabrication, suppliers normally have various team members in process engineering, tooling engineering, sales, project management, quality engineering, and supply chain. These different faculties participate in Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) for varying reasons.

Suppliers prepare Design Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (DFMEA) and Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) forms along with control plan forms, dimensional inspection reports, and other forms as needed. When engineering revision changes (which happens frequently!), then all the participants must change their respective forms. As we all know, it\’s difficult to ensure that all forms are changed correctly, as too often traditional Excel documents for each of APQP forms are developed, maintained, and updated using cumbersome document management systems. Often documents are stored on individual computers with manufacturing, sales, and other team members lacking access to it.

During audits, it’s not unusual for companies to use this method to find costly variances—from team members using wrong design revision levels and drawing numbers, etc. Not using the correct revision or drawing results in poor quality, longer lead times, and an overall increase in waste and cost.

APQP and Quality Management Systems (QMS)

There are a number of new software tools recently introduced for better APQP and quality management systems. Best-in-class software allows companies to configure 3, 4, or 5 gates. Each gate is customized for each individual company. Each gate can allow specific APQP and project management company tasks or milestones along with the responsible team member. Whether the company has divisions across the world or one small plant, configurable APQP software allows the roles of team members to be assigned at various milestones and gates of the project.

Best-in-class software also has predesigned standard forms for DFMEA, PFMEA, Control Forms, PPAP, and other standard forms. These configurable forms allow quick updates to any of these documents, as changes inevitably happen during the project timeline. They also retain old copies of the forms and are easily accessible not only during the project timeline but also during the entire product lifetime till obsolescence and service life.

QMS software also allows reporting of any and all quality issues during development and production using simple phone-based apps. Quality problems can be escalated higher up the management order or to other departments quickly and in real-time using these apps, allowing team members to know, react, contribute, and manage quality spills properly.

While APQP management and production quality reporting have progressed very little over the last 30 years – this new class of software tools is allowing team members around the world to work collaboratively and in real-time to maintain intellectual property documents, project documents, improve project lead times, and allow flawless launches which OEMs and customers expect.


Republished from Simple Solutions That Work, Issue 17, Fall 2022

Frequently Asked Questions

Q 1. What is APQP in the context of automotive foundries?

Ans. APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) is a method that automotive foundries use to plan, design, validate, and launch new products. It helps maintain controlled processes, predictable quality, and clear communication among engineering, tooling, production, and quality teams.

Q 2. Why is APQP difficult for foundries to manage using traditional tools like Excel?

Ans. Traditional Excel-based APQP forms (DFMEA, PFMEA, Control Plans, Dimensional Reports) are difficult to track when revisions happen. Files end up spread out across emails, shared drives, and personal desktops. This increases the chance of using outdated drawings or process documents, which can lead to quality problems, delays, and failures during audits.

Q 3. How do engineering changes impact APQP documentation?

Ans. Engineering revisions require every APQP form, PFMEA, DFMEA, Control Plan, and inspection reports to be updated. When multiple teams handle documents manually, they often miss changes. This can lead to inconsistencies and nonconformance during audits or production.

Q 4. How can foundries reduce errors caused by incorrect design or revision levels?

Ans. Digitizing APQP documents in a cloud-based system makes sure that all teams, including quality, engineering, tooling, production, and sales, can access the same controlled documents. Version tracking, approvals, and permission-based access lower the risk of using outdated drawings or specifications.

Q 5. What are the benefits of using a cloud-based APQP system like MESH for foundries?

Ans. A system like MESH APQP and QMS offers:

  • Centralized APQP forms and product history.

  • Automatic version control.

  • Configurable gates and milestones.

  • Real-time updates across teams.

  • Mobile quality issue reporting.

  • Faster audit preparation and better compliance.

  • Less rework and shorter launch timelines.

Q 6. How does digital APQP improve collaboration across departments?

Ans. Digital platforms provide engineering, tooling, sales, production, and quality teams with a common view of project status, revisions, milestones, and issues. This reduces communication barriers and helps improve the project lifecycle.

Q 7. Why is APQP important for automotive customers and OEMs?

Ans. OEMs expect perfect launches, traceability, and strong quality planning. Effective APQP cuts down on waste, improves process capability, speeds up launch timelines, and makes sure suppliers meet customer expectations and industry standards.

Q 8. Does MESH QMS support quality issue reporting during development and production?

Ans. Yes. MESH includes an easy-to-use mobile app for reporting defects, nonconformances, and quality spills in real time. Issues can be escalated immediately, logged into APQP records, and used for corrective actions and lessons learned.

Q 9. Can small and mid-sized foundries benefit from digital APQP tools?

Ans. Absolutely. Small foundries often do not have full-time project engineers or document controllers. MESH’s flexible workflows, ready-made templates, and cloud access enable teams to handle APQP effectively without significant IT costs or complicated software.

Q 10. How does digitizing APQP help with customer audits?

Ans. Digital APQP systems store all controlled forms, old revisions, and supporting evidence in one location. During an audit, teams can quickly retrieve documents. They can demonstrate revision control, show project timing, and provide traceability. This process strengthens customer confidence.

Engineering
You may also like